Monday, November 10, 2008
Joining the Blogosphere #4
I observed my blog today and I noticed that they have a lot of video clips. I think adding video clips with the story makes it a bit more interesting. They also have a special clip that they call Clip du jour which is something they seem to have at random moments. The clip today was a landslide in Japan from 2004. They also had another Twilight story, which is bugging me. Then I looked harder at it and realized that they are doing it in different parts and they are on part 3. I'm not sure how many parts there are, but I'm hoping the movie is as good as the hype. I checked back into the true blood story and there were a lot of comments especially after last nights episode. I also noticed that someone posted a comment that had nothing to do with the show. They complained that the PopWatch Blog never have any blogs about "It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia" a television series on FX. I'm not done observing just yet; I'll just see what is next.
Sunday, November 9, 2008
Joining the Blogosphere #3
I was observing my blog today and there wasn't a lot of new stories. I also noticed that many comments were posted to old stories and many of the newer stories had few comments. I mentioned before that they have a section that names the top contributors, but today I noticed that there was a different author not named in the section. Also, beneath the title of the stories they have categories where you can also find the same story. I went to check on the True Blood post that I had a made and it is still pulling in traffic. True Blood is growing in popularity so that explains the high traffic. I also noticed the community atmosphere especially when I read some comments and they mention the authors of the other comments that were made. I never really thought that you could really build a community within a blog but obviously it exist.
Friday, November 7, 2008
Joining the Blogosphere #2
I guess vampires are all the rage these days. I was observing my blog again today I continued to notice a lot of stories about the new vampire flick Twilight. It's based on a series of books by Stephanie Meyers. I've never read any of the books, but I heard they were amazing. In light of this I went back to where I posted my comment yesterday and I noticed there were 4 new postings. I find this amazing because the article that I posted the comment to was from September 8th. I noticed that there were a lot of the same people posting to the blog and they were in between in on going conversation. The few I really noticed were Nola, malee smith and Carlos. I noticed that not any one can blog here. They actually have a section titled Top Authors, that makes me think that there is some kind of hierarchy here. I also notice that on the side they have a section for the latest comments on a particular story and they have a link to it. I like what I am seeing here and it is pretty easy to traverse from story to story; It's also pretty fun.
Thursday, November 6, 2008
Joining the Blogosphere #1
Having to choose a blog to observe was a lot tougher than I thought. When I first received this assignment I thought that it was going to be a breeze, man was I wrong! After some careful consideration I decided a couple of days ago to observe this blog called Popwatch; It is affiliated with the magazine Entertainment Weekly. I chose this one because my life pretty much revolves around anything "pop culture." I also thought that it would be interesting to see how many other "fanatics" were out there.
At first observation they had stories about the new vampire movie "Twilight" and a video of the star saying that he wasn't "beautiful" enough for the role. I read some comments that some of the readers made and most of them were pretty positive such as: from ker, "He's so natural and adorable. I'm very fond of him" and from di, "He's the most beautiful man I think I've ever seen." Since we were on the subject of vampires I decided to search for my new obsession, HBO's True Blood. I found an article and I was excited so I decided to post a comment about my love for the show under the name "Tea." I also noticed the blog roll with links to other entertainment blogs. I'm excited to continue my journey through the "blogosphere."
At first observation they had stories about the new vampire movie "Twilight" and a video of the star saying that he wasn't "beautiful" enough for the role. I read some comments that some of the readers made and most of them were pretty positive such as: from ker, "He's so natural and adorable. I'm very fond of him" and from di, "He's the most beautiful man I think I've ever seen." Since we were on the subject of vampires I decided to search for my new obsession, HBO's True Blood. I found an article and I was excited so I decided to post a comment about my love for the show under the name "Tea." I also noticed the blog roll with links to other entertainment blogs. I'm excited to continue my journey through the "blogosphere."
Monday, October 20, 2008
Wikis
The article that I read for today’s class is titled "Wikis-What are they?" by Brian Lamb. Wikis are described as “a diverse set of systems, features, approaches, and projects” (p.38). Many people use wikis today in many different ways, but there are some principle features of the medium. Some of the features are: it can be edited by anyone, it uses hypertext markup language, wiki pages can be linked to one another and the content on the page is never complete (Lamb, 2004). Wikis can be quite fascinating and they are often used in large group collaborations (Lamb, 2004).
According to Lamb, many people are concerned about their work being edited (Lamb, 2004). This is a concern because there is not someone organizing and constantly monitoring the page. This also makes it hard for people to navigate their way around the page. Many people have no idea where to go and what to look for, but eventually they learn to operate it. There has also been an increase in the use of wikis in the academic world. Many institutes of higher education have been experimenting with this medium and teachers have been using them as a learning tool (Lamb, 2004). Although the use of wikis has increased over years, it is still an underused medium that, hopefully, in years will continue to grow.
I thought it was interesting to read that people were concerned with the wikis appearance. Some people complained that the interface was unattractive. I think that should not be a concern as long as they are able to use it effectively. When things are unappealing to someone they do not take the time to look at it (Lamb, 2004). People are often unsatisfied with things when they do not understand it and they may lose the opportunity to experience something new.
According to Lamb, many people are concerned about their work being edited (Lamb, 2004). This is a concern because there is not someone organizing and constantly monitoring the page. This also makes it hard for people to navigate their way around the page. Many people have no idea where to go and what to look for, but eventually they learn to operate it. There has also been an increase in the use of wikis in the academic world. Many institutes of higher education have been experimenting with this medium and teachers have been using them as a learning tool (Lamb, 2004). Although the use of wikis has increased over years, it is still an underused medium that, hopefully, in years will continue to grow.
I thought it was interesting to read that people were concerned with the wikis appearance. Some people complained that the interface was unattractive. I think that should not be a concern as long as they are able to use it effectively. When things are unappealing to someone they do not take the time to look at it (Lamb, 2004). People are often unsatisfied with things when they do not understand it and they may lose the opportunity to experience something new.
Sunday, October 19, 2008
Information
Searching for information on the Internet can be taxing. There are many different search engines that can be used to provide you with the information you are looking for. Some search engines work better than others leaving you to do more research. Google, LexisNexis and AltaVista were all helpful in researching the popular medium Facebook.
Like I mentioned before the search engines that I used were Google, AltaVista and LexisNexis. I decided to use these for different reasons. Using Google was the obvious choice because it is one of the most widely used sites around the world. AltaVista was used because I have never used it before and I wanted to try it out. The last one that I used was AltaVista, which is an academic search engine/database. I used this site because during my research I found a lot of information that connected to Facebook.
In order to do research on a topic through these search engines/databases you will need to use keywords. Keywords enable you to narrow down the information that you are looking for. The keywords that I used were “Facebook”, “What is Facebook?”, “Mark Zuckerberg” and “the history of Facebook.” Although each of these keywords is slightly different from one another, when I typed them in most of the results that back came were the same.
I found various results upon typing in these different keywords. The first thing I did was go to Google.com and type in “Facebook” the first thing that came up was facebook.com. Then, I found crunchbase.com which provided a company profile of the site. The New York Times wrote an article about Facebook. These results were all found on page 1 of over 583 million results. Once I got to the second page I decided to change the keyword. I then typed in “What is Facebook”, this resulted in irrelevant information. Most of what I found was self-definitions about Facebook. I found this information on blogs; one in particular was by someone named MOBIZ. Then I decided to try the keyword “Mark Zuckerberg”, the creator of Facebook, his Wikipedia page was the first result. The next thing that popped up was the Forbes list of world billionaires. The next thing that I looked at was the executive bios on the Facebook site. This provided a list of the people who own and operate the site.
The next search engine I took a look at was AltaVista. I typed in “facebook” and most of the results that I found were the same ones that I found in Google. Then I typed in “the history of facebook” and it was the same effect as before, these were results that I found on Google. I decided to reword it and I typed in “facebook history.” I found an article in Rolling Stone magazine that detailed a battle over who actually created Facebook. Under the same keyword I found a short article about a Facebook movie being produced by Aaron Sorkin.
The last search engine that I used was LexisNexis. LexisNexis is an academic database and it provided me with a lot of useful information. I typed in the primary keyword “facebook.” When I entered that a large amount of results were produced. This database allows you to sort your results by publication date. I sorted it by relevance first and then I tried publication date. When I did that an article about Facebook ads and how they are targeting Facebook users came up. I also found a Washington Post article about Facebook and narcissism.
Using these search engines I was given the opportunity to see what each one had to offer. I found that the Google search was most effective. I admit that I have a biased towards AltaVista and LexisNexis because Google is the most popular of the three. Google has a reputation of being a really good search engine. I used many different keywords, but I think “facebook” was the most effective. When I typed this in for each search engine this produced the most results. It would make sense that this would have a lot of results because that is the only term that has to be searched. Using the other ones such as “what is” or “the history” of Facebook gives the search engine permission to look for things with those entire phrase in it or just “the” or “what is.” It was hard finding a lot of things on Mark Zuckerberg because the results were showing information on other Mark Zuckerbergs who were not the creators of Facebook.
Some of the sources that I found were useful and others were not. When you are looking for information online, there are some criteria that should be followed to determine the quality (Tensen, 2004). The sources that I found that I would use again are Facebook.com, New York Times, Forbes.com, Rolling Stone Magazine, and the article that I found on LexisNexis by Newsweek. I would use these again because these are credible sources and they have good reputations. The publication dates are also updated and recent. The sources that I would not use again are Wikipedia, Mobiz, and Mashable.com. I would not use these because they are not very reliable. Wikipedia and Mashable are similar because you can edit the information on both sites. When it comes to information being edited it is hard to know if you can trust it or not because since anyone can edit it, there may not be anyone moderating. MOBIZ is a blog so it is someone’s opinion and opinions vary from person to person and also the reputation for this blog can not be accounted for.
Searching for information on the Internet can be challenging. The challenge is finding useful and reliable information. Since the Internet has such high traffic you are bound to come across all sorts of things. When you are looking through this information it is important to evaluate each thing carefully, so that you are not using something that can make your work incredible.
Buffardi, Laura E. (2008). "Mirror, Mirror on the (Facebook) Wall" The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/custom/2008/10/10/CU2008101002890.html
Lyons, Daniel. (2008). "Facebook's Roar Becomes a Meow; Putting ads in front of Facebook users is like hanging out a party interrupting conversations to hawk merchandise." Newsweek, Enterprise; Techtonic Shifts; Pg. E22 Vol. 152 No. 16. http://www.newsweek.com/id/163120
Tensen, Bonnie L. (2004). Research strategies for a digital age (chapter 5). Boston: Wadsworth.
Like I mentioned before the search engines that I used were Google, AltaVista and LexisNexis. I decided to use these for different reasons. Using Google was the obvious choice because it is one of the most widely used sites around the world. AltaVista was used because I have never used it before and I wanted to try it out. The last one that I used was AltaVista, which is an academic search engine/database. I used this site because during my research I found a lot of information that connected to Facebook.
In order to do research on a topic through these search engines/databases you will need to use keywords. Keywords enable you to narrow down the information that you are looking for. The keywords that I used were “Facebook”, “What is Facebook?”, “Mark Zuckerberg” and “the history of Facebook.” Although each of these keywords is slightly different from one another, when I typed them in most of the results that back came were the same.
I found various results upon typing in these different keywords. The first thing I did was go to Google.com and type in “Facebook” the first thing that came up was facebook.com. Then, I found crunchbase.com which provided a company profile of the site. The New York Times wrote an article about Facebook. These results were all found on page 1 of over 583 million results. Once I got to the second page I decided to change the keyword. I then typed in “What is Facebook”, this resulted in irrelevant information. Most of what I found was self-definitions about Facebook. I found this information on blogs; one in particular was by someone named MOBIZ. Then I decided to try the keyword “Mark Zuckerberg”, the creator of Facebook, his Wikipedia page was the first result. The next thing that popped up was the Forbes list of world billionaires. The next thing that I looked at was the executive bios on the Facebook site. This provided a list of the people who own and operate the site.
The next search engine I took a look at was AltaVista. I typed in “facebook” and most of the results that I found were the same ones that I found in Google. Then I typed in “the history of facebook” and it was the same effect as before, these were results that I found on Google. I decided to reword it and I typed in “facebook history.” I found an article in Rolling Stone magazine that detailed a battle over who actually created Facebook. Under the same keyword I found a short article about a Facebook movie being produced by Aaron Sorkin.
The last search engine that I used was LexisNexis. LexisNexis is an academic database and it provided me with a lot of useful information. I typed in the primary keyword “facebook.” When I entered that a large amount of results were produced. This database allows you to sort your results by publication date. I sorted it by relevance first and then I tried publication date. When I did that an article about Facebook ads and how they are targeting Facebook users came up. I also found a Washington Post article about Facebook and narcissism.
Using these search engines I was given the opportunity to see what each one had to offer. I found that the Google search was most effective. I admit that I have a biased towards AltaVista and LexisNexis because Google is the most popular of the three. Google has a reputation of being a really good search engine. I used many different keywords, but I think “facebook” was the most effective. When I typed this in for each search engine this produced the most results. It would make sense that this would have a lot of results because that is the only term that has to be searched. Using the other ones such as “what is” or “the history” of Facebook gives the search engine permission to look for things with those entire phrase in it or just “the” or “what is.” It was hard finding a lot of things on Mark Zuckerberg because the results were showing information on other Mark Zuckerbergs who were not the creators of Facebook.
Some of the sources that I found were useful and others were not. When you are looking for information online, there are some criteria that should be followed to determine the quality (Tensen, 2004). The sources that I found that I would use again are Facebook.com, New York Times, Forbes.com, Rolling Stone Magazine, and the article that I found on LexisNexis by Newsweek. I would use these again because these are credible sources and they have good reputations. The publication dates are also updated and recent. The sources that I would not use again are Wikipedia, Mobiz, and Mashable.com. I would not use these because they are not very reliable. Wikipedia and Mashable are similar because you can edit the information on both sites. When it comes to information being edited it is hard to know if you can trust it or not because since anyone can edit it, there may not be anyone moderating. MOBIZ is a blog so it is someone’s opinion and opinions vary from person to person and also the reputation for this blog can not be accounted for.
Searching for information on the Internet can be challenging. The challenge is finding useful and reliable information. Since the Internet has such high traffic you are bound to come across all sorts of things. When you are looking through this information it is important to evaluate each thing carefully, so that you are not using something that can make your work incredible.
Buffardi, Laura E. (2008). "Mirror, Mirror on the (Facebook) Wall" The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/custom/2008/10/10/CU2008101002890.html
Lyons, Daniel. (2008). "Facebook's Roar Becomes a Meow; Putting ads in front of Facebook users is like hanging out a party interrupting conversations to hawk merchandise." Newsweek, Enterprise; Techtonic Shifts; Pg. E22 Vol. 152 No. 16. http://www.newsweek.com/id/163120
Tensen, Bonnie L. (2004). Research strategies for a digital age (chapter 5). Boston: Wadsworth.
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Web 2.0
The article that I read for class is “What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software.” by Tim O’Reilly. In this article he is hoping to help readers understand what Web 2.0 is. O’ Reilly says Web 2.0 can be visualized “as a set of principles and practices that tie together a veritable solar system of sites that demonstrate some or all of those principles, at a varying distance from that core” (O’Reilly n.p.n) This definition is quite broad and still does not make the idea of Web 2.0 clear.
In the article O’Reilly also breaks down the core components of Web 2.0, in regard to companies, into seven key principles. The first is “services”, the more people use these services the better they become (O’Reilly n.p.n). The second is gaining an advantage over unique data sources. The third is “trusting users as co-developers” (O’Reilly n.p.n). The fourth is “harnessing collective intelligence” (O’Reilly n.p.n). The fifth is “leveraging the long tail through customer self service” (O’Reilly n.p.n). The long tail is basically saying that companies need to incorporate every aspect of the Web instead of the focusing on one part. The sixth part is “software above the level of a single device” (O’Reilly n.p.n). The last one “lightweight user interfaces, development models, AND business models” (O’Reilly n.p.n).
One part of the article I found interesting was about how Itunes is one of the first devices that was able to mix portability with the Web (O’Reilly). I absolutely love my Ipod and I can’t imagine not having it with me. In order to use an Ipod you have to have access to the Internet. The only way to download music to your Ipod is to have Itunes. The computer also charges the device, so having a computer is a necessity for owning an Ipod.
In the article O’Reilly also breaks down the core components of Web 2.0, in regard to companies, into seven key principles. The first is “services”, the more people use these services the better they become (O’Reilly n.p.n). The second is gaining an advantage over unique data sources. The third is “trusting users as co-developers” (O’Reilly n.p.n). The fourth is “harnessing collective intelligence” (O’Reilly n.p.n). The fifth is “leveraging the long tail through customer self service” (O’Reilly n.p.n). The long tail is basically saying that companies need to incorporate every aspect of the Web instead of the focusing on one part. The sixth part is “software above the level of a single device” (O’Reilly n.p.n). The last one “lightweight user interfaces, development models, AND business models” (O’Reilly n.p.n).
One part of the article I found interesting was about how Itunes is one of the first devices that was able to mix portability with the Web (O’Reilly). I absolutely love my Ipod and I can’t imagine not having it with me. In order to use an Ipod you have to have access to the Internet. The only way to download music to your Ipod is to have Itunes. The computer also charges the device, so having a computer is a necessity for owning an Ipod.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)